Comments on: Out With the Old, In With the New http://www.rachelleb.com/2005/01/12/out-with-the-old-in-with-the-new/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:57:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: ArthurE212 http://www.rachelleb.com/2005/01/12/out-with-the-old-in-with-the-new/comment-page-1/#comment-6749 ArthurE212 Sun, 16 Jan 2005 05:38:32 +0000 http://wp.rachelleb.com/?p=1323#comment-6749 Good camera choice, Rachelle. The G6 might have been a tad big for your purposes. Keep us posted on your level of satisfaction with the A95 - You've got way more pixels than you need for posting online, but i bet your prints look great. Are you shooting auto or learning your p's and q's or... F's and S's (A's and T's?). I'm looking forward to seeing how this camera does with your Food photos. Good camera choice, Rachelle. The G6 might have been a tad big for your purposes. Keep us posted on your level of satisfaction with the A95 – You’ve got way more pixels than you need for posting online, but i bet your prints look great. Are you shooting auto or learning your p’s and q’s or… F’s and S’s (A’s and T’s?).
I’m looking forward to seeing how this camera does with your Food photos.

]]> By: Sarah http://www.rachelleb.com/2005/01/12/out-with-the-old-in-with-the-new/comment-page-1/#comment-6748 Sarah Fri, 14 Jan 2005 05:22:48 +0000 http://wp.rachelleb.com/?p=1323#comment-6748 Oh my lord, I can't believe you took all of those wonderful pictures using a 2 megapixel PowerShot--was that the only camera you used? You need to teach a photography class. Oh my lord, I can’t believe you took all of those wonderful pictures using a 2 megapixel PowerShot–was that the only camera you used?

You need to teach a photography class.

]]> By: spudart http://www.rachelleb.com/2005/01/12/out-with-the-old-in-with-the-new/comment-page-1/#comment-6747 spudart Fri, 14 Jan 2005 02:21:22 +0000 http://wp.rachelleb.com/?p=1323#comment-6747 wow, i have an old clunker Elph S110. I've also been comtemplating replacing it. 2.0 megapixels. yipes! wow, i have an old clunker Elph S110. I’ve also been comtemplating replacing it. 2.0 megapixels. yipes!

]]> By: Dave http://www.rachelleb.com/2005/01/12/out-with-the-old-in-with-the-new/comment-page-1/#comment-6746 Dave Thu, 13 Jan 2005 01:57:01 +0000 http://wp.rachelleb.com/?p=1323#comment-6746 Congratulations and good luck with "the new baby". Congratulations and good luck with “the new baby”.

]]> By: Edwin http://www.rachelleb.com/2005/01/12/out-with-the-old-in-with-the-new/comment-page-1/#comment-6745 Edwin Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:48:54 +0000 http://wp.rachelleb.com/?p=1323#comment-6745 Wow! That is really nice. Can't wait to see the new pics from it! I'm curious as to how you like using that one and if it's bulky or just right. hehe. Oh, and can anyone out there humor me by visiting my blog and leaving a comment? I'm desperate! *lol* :-P Wow! That is really nice. Can’t wait to see the new pics from it! I’m curious as to how you like using that one and if it’s bulky or just right. hehe. Oh, and can anyone out there humor me by visiting my blog and leaving a comment? I’m desperate! *lol* :-P

]]> By: Geremy F http://www.rachelleb.com/2005/01/12/out-with-the-old-in-with-the-new/comment-page-1/#comment-6744 Geremy F Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:50:35 +0000 http://wp.rachelleb.com/?p=1323#comment-6744 Wow... the elph has been through a lot Wow… the elph has been through a lot

]]> By: rachelle http://www.rachelleb.com/2005/01/12/out-with-the-old-in-with-the-new/comment-page-1/#comment-6743 rachelle Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:45:44 +0000 http://wp.rachelleb.com/?p=1323#comment-6743 uh. i just scratched off that "crack".. so it wasn't really a crack but some kind of white crap stuck on there. uh. i just scratched off that “crack”.. so it wasn’t really a crack but some kind of white crap stuck on there.

]]> By: tien http://www.rachelleb.com/2005/01/12/out-with-the-old-in-with-the-new/comment-page-1/#comment-6742 tien Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:34:31 +0000 http://wp.rachelleb.com/?p=1323#comment-6742 very nice. so is it clunky? looks like the macro function works. very nice. so is it clunky? looks like the macro function works.

]]>